5 ms·
It's worth noting that Smashing Magazine is not normally a full-on blogazine; only this particular article was like this. Their previous post was much more in t
by rudd 17y ago
It's worth noting that Smashing Magazine is not normally a full-on blogazine; only this particular article was like this. Their previous post was much more in the format of a normal blog: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2009/11/18/designing-css-buttons-techniques-and-resources/ http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2009/11/18/designing-css-but...
- cruise02 17y agoThey have "magazine" right in their name.
- sjs382 17y agoYou seem to have missed the point of the article and instead fixated on the "azine" part. Unfortunate.
- cruise02 17y agoHow is that unfortunate? Do you really think that I'd be poised to launch the next Earth-shattering blogazine, if only I understood the subtle point of this article? Or were you just trying to be clever, without demonstrating any insight of your own?
- sjs382 17y ago> How is that unfortunate? Because your comments may dissuade people from reading the article who may otherwise enjoy it. > Do you really think that I'd be poised to launch the next Earth-shattering blogazine, if only I understood the subtle point of this article? No. > Or were you just trying to be clever, without demonstrating any insight of your own? No.
- cruise02 17y agoMy initial comment was only intended to remind people that it was in fact a blogazine that was declaring the death of blogs and the rise of blogazines. I don't mean to dissuade anyone from actually reading the article for themselves, we just need to be aware of whose opinions we're listening to. If you're going to criticize someone for "missing the point" you should at a minimum explain what it is they don't get, that way you demonstrate that it is not you who has missed the point