3 ms·
How so? Your claim sounds "obviously false". We need an example.
by loup-vaillant 12y ago
How so? Your claim sounds "obviously false". We need an example.
- loup-vaillant 12y agoScrap the scare quotes, it is obviously false. Less code in the small does imply less code in the large. It doesn't need any justification, it is a tautology: if it takes less code to write all the small things in your program, the program itself will have less code overall. Or did I misunderstood the meaning of "less code"?