4 ms·

Not to mention "Call me maybe: Redis" [0]. Rinse and repeat for every NoSQL database out there. Point is, @aphyr skewers everybody. Aerospike is just the flavo

Not to mention "Call me maybe: Redis" [0]. Rinse and repeat for every NoSQL database out there. Point is, @aphyr skewers everybody. Aerospike is just the flavor of the month. [0] https://aphyr.com/posts/283-call-me-maybe-redis https://aphyr.com/posts/283-call-me-maybe-redis

jbergens 11y ago
I think FoundationDb got great scores from Aphyr, sadly it is now owned by Apple. For the others the big problem is when they promise some kind of ACID and cannot achieve it, if they were explicit with what the supported all customers could make informed decisions. Relations systems are generally bad ad horizontal scaling and can get very slow with full ACID over many servers.
- masklinn 11y ago
  > I think FoundationDb got great scores from Aphyr, FoundationDB ran Jepsen internally and reported stuff[0], Kyle never worked with it. [0] http://blog.foundationdb.com/call-me-maybe-foundationdb-vs-jepsen http://blog.foundationdb.com/call-me-maybe-foundationdb-vs-j... half broken now, none of the images load for me. @aphyr seems to have taken them at their word wrt testing though: https://twitter.com/aphyr/status/405017101804396546 https://twitter.com/aphyr/status/405017101804396546
  - annnnd 11y ago
    Curious: how difficult is it to replicate aphyr's tests? Can we beleive independent entities posting jepsen reports on some random DB?
woozy 11y ago
Antirez was very receptive http://antirez.com/news/55 http://antirez.com/news/55
- masklinn 11y ago
  Aphyr wasn't overly impressed by that response though https://aphyr.com/posts/287-asynchronous-replication-with-failover https://aphyr.com/posts/287-asynchronous-replication-with-fa...
lmm 11y ago
I think that's a false equivalence. Aphyr is pretty positive about Riak (with the correct configuration) and Cassandra (when used for appropriate scenarios). If I was choosing a new system those are the two I'd be looking at.

jbergens 11y ago

I think FoundationDb got great scores from Aphyr, sadly it is now owned by Apple. For the others the big problem is when they promise some kind of ACID and cannot achieve it, if they were explicit with what the supported all customers could make informed decisions. Relations systems are generally bad ad horizontal scaling and can get very slow with full ACID over many servers.

masklinn 11y ago
> I think FoundationDb got great scores from Aphyr, FoundationDB ran Jepsen internally and reported stuff[0], Kyle never worked with it. [0] http://blog.foundationdb.com/call-me-maybe-foundationdb-vs-jepsen http://blog.foundationdb.com/call-me-maybe-foundationdb-vs-j... half broken now, none of the images load for me. @aphyr seems to have taken them at their word wrt testing though: https://twitter.com/aphyr/status/405017101804396546 https://twitter.com/aphyr/status/405017101804396546
- annnnd 11y ago
  Curious: how difficult is it to replicate aphyr's tests? Can we beleive independent entities posting jepsen reports on some random DB?

woozy 11y ago

Antirez was very receptive http://antirez.com/news/55 http://antirez.com/news/55

masklinn 11y ago
Aphyr wasn't overly impressed by that response though https://aphyr.com/posts/287-asynchronous-replication-with-failover https://aphyr.com/posts/287-asynchronous-replication-with-fa...

lmm 11y ago

I think that's a false equivalence. Aphyr is pretty positive about Riak (with the correct configuration) and Cassandra (when used for appropriate scenarios). If I was choosing a new system those are the two I'd be looking at.