3 ms·
I got 600-1170ms with the cache disabled, and 410-515ms with it enabled. That's fine. I wouldn't call it "insanely fast" though (or even just fast... it's just
by rgbrenner 12y ago
I got 600-1170ms with the cache disabled, and 410-515ms with it enabled.
That's fine. I wouldn't call it "insanely fast" though (or even just fast... it's just ok).
Has the bar dropped this low that we now think 500ms is "insanely" fast?
- agumonkey 12y ago1.5s here. It's not the total time, but the way it loads, 3 bunches of very quick accumulations. Pleasurable to witness.
- waskosky 12y agoI think the fact that animations are occurring right away is what contributes to the illusion. Most sites with any kind of animation aren't using CSS for it yet, and on those sites the javascript (which usually begins execution late in the rendering) introduces extra time to load any kind of animation, leading to a perception of slowness that is actually occurring client side.