I guess what the blog poster means is not the standard [a,o) notation, but the "obliteration operator" ^ in the notation {a, a+1, ô}. It indeed reminds me of `f

I guess what the blog poster means is not the standard [a,o) notation, but the "obliteration operator" ^ in the notation {a, a+1, ô}. It indeed reminds me of `for (i = a; i < o, i++)`. Interestingly, this also reminds me a bit of Nims new `for i in a..<o` syntax.