3 ms·
Article was pretty disappointing. It's not that he did not make valid (although general and vague) points, but the question "Why deep learning is a mandate for
by nightski 12y ago
Article was pretty disappointing. It's not that he did not make valid (although general and vague) points, but the question "Why deep learning is a mandate for humans" was not answered in a satisfying manner at all.
- mkagenius 12y agoYeah, do they choose title for the article even before the interview, these days?
- trendroid 12y agoBefore reading, I did ctrl+f for the keywords in the title and straight away realized it will be misleading. Wasn't proven wrong and hence not disappointed. For some reason, I was hoping to find some hack on learning better
- 0xdeadbeefbabe 12y agoThe hack, though not stated, seems to be visit coursera and start learning or start machine learning :) which is a current course by Ng.
- rndn 12y agoI was similarily disappointed by the AMA. It didn't reveal anything new and just sounded like someone selling deep learning technology.
- visarga 12y agoHaven't you heard? They discovered "deep learning for humans". It's called Coursera. Now, deep learning can be a mandate for both humans and machines.