You make it sound new, but the article makes it sound like it's been an issue since the 70's, except maybe for narrow instances in the last year with the previo

You make it sound new, but the article makes it sound like it's been an issue since the 70's, except maybe for narrow instances in the last year with the previous ruling. I've been aware of and uncomfortable about digital applications of the "third party doctrine" for a few years already -- does this ruling open that door wider?