There is scholarpedia, which was initially crippled by the fact that each article (which was similar to a review) would often be limited to the (invited and aut

There is scholarpedia, which was initially crippled by the fact that each article (which was similar to a review) would often be limited to the (invited and authoritative) author's point of view. In fact they have iterated their policies . Still their contents are often adapted copies of review articles published in "real" journals.