> It's too bad his plan ignores the monopoly TimeWarner has over service to most of his city's customers. In many buildings in NYC, that's because TimeWarner p

> It's too bad his plan ignores the monopoly TimeWarner has over service to most of his city's customers. In many buildings in NYC, that's because TimeWarner provides kickbacks[0] to the management company and/or superintendent to be the exclusive provider of television service for the building[1]. It's illegal (AFAIK) but almost completely unenforced. [0] Usually in the form of free or discounted service (for their personal cable bill). [1] If I remember correctly, they specifically do it for television and not phone (or Internet) due to regulation around phone service. However, Verizon no longer installs FiOS to a location if they can't provide TV service to that location, so it amounts to the same thing.