2 ms·
Most people don't appreciate the transition to digitized images & audio went thru early on: as the technology went mainstream, there was an extreme insufficienc
by ctdonath 12y ago
Most people don't appreciate the transition to digitized images & audio went thru early on: as the technology went mainstream, there was an extreme insufficiency of storage space & network bandwidth that had to be overcome as a chicken-and-egg problem. In a day where multi-mile wireless >10Mbps bandwidth & >32GB storage to your pocket is cheap, we forget how painful desktop wired dialup bandwidth & ~100MB storage was, and the crazy contortions we had to go thru to transfer & store digital images & audio. FFTs and subjective image extraction solved those problems, leaving artifacts which utterly baffle today's users who can, say, store a full year's worth of HD video for $50, or 200GB wireless cloud hosting for $4/mo.
Yeah, we could have done digital audio without FFTs. Woulda been infeasible though given the circumstances.
- acqq 12y agoIt certainly was done without FFT and it was still good enough: ADPCM. No FFT. Worked on my 1991 PC: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/89879 https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/89879 "22 kHz mono ADPCM can be decompressed real-time (that is, while playing) on a 386SX/16 megahertz CPU" Note: 16 MHz 386SX was effectively slower than the 286 of the same speed. I had all the Beatles albums on one CD, all encoded with ADPCM, and the sound was not bad. If I remember correctly, the guys at Bell Labs had also some server filled with the digital music. But I can't locate the story (maybe somebody remembers, was it Ritchie or Thompson?) and don't remember when actually.