Thanks for this insight, I absolutely agree that diluting the value of stock was a bad move by her. Regarding the first point you made I'm somehow split. The m

Thanks for this insight, I absolutely agree that diluting the value of stock was a bad move by her. Regarding the first point you made I'm somehow split. The mere act of laying off employees to hire more cheap labor in other countries can in some cases make sense from a business perspective. How you feel about that comes down to the personal value system you have. I think most people would agree that one important task of any business is to benefit the community. (by paying wages, taxes or creating cheaper services and products) The question here is how much benefit to the community is enough. From a purely legal perspective paying taxes and obeying all laws is sufficient. One might also argue that she created jobs oversees where now other communities benefit. For me personally it was wrong to do what she did, as long as it wasn't necessary for the survival of the company, but I also recognise that I can't demand from any business to follow my personal value system in addition to the laws we have.