3 ms·
I've been pondering this for a little while -- I agree with you, and I think it's because the point being conveyed isn't the data, but the scale.
by rev_bird 11y ago
I've been pondering this for a little while -- I agree with you, and I think it's because the point being conveyed isn't the data, but the scale.
- vinceguidry 11y agohttp://xkcd.com/1162/ http://xkcd.com/1162/
- teamhappy 11y agoExactly. 32 bytes from /dev/random doesn't sound like much. 2^256 still doesn't sound like much. But 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640564039457584007913129639936 makes your point (the point being that it's a effing big number).