3 ms·
So I propose an experiment. I recently published in Scientific Reports. This journal's article metrics includes twitter postings. At the moment I show 34 tweets
by mellavora 12y ago
So I propose an experiment. I recently published in Scientific Reports. This journal's article metrics includes twitter postings. At the moment I show 34 tweets-- yes, it is trivial, but still puts me in the upper ~15%.
I'm going to set up the first two steps of this guy's formula (search for niche users; post interesting content) where the "interesting content" will be the article.
We can check back on my article stats in a week, compare growth in tweets vs growth in accesses/downloads.
This is all a bit silly, the important influence will be if this effort gets the article cited more often, and it will be a year before we have any data on that (plus no way to link the data to twitter activity).
I'll put a writeup on "show hacker news". Oh, the scientific article + metrics is here:
http://www.nature.com/srep/2015/150302/srep08665/metrics http://www.nature.com/srep/2015/150302/srep08665/metrics
- karanjthakkar 12y agoThats actually a fantastic idea. No better way to trust something than to try it out. Please do it and let me know if it works for you.
- mellavora 12y agoOk, I'll report daily progress here: https://twitterexperiment.wordpress.com/ https://twitterexperiment.wordpress.com/