Unfortunately, you're perfectly parroting the State's position that assets somehow don't have the presumption of innocence that persons do in the US legal syste

Unfortunately, you're perfectly parroting the State's position that assets somehow don't have the presumption of innocence that persons do in the US legal system. The state should have to prove that the assets are the proceeds of criminality in order to seize them, rather than their owner having to prove otherwise once they've been seized.