http://reason.com/blog/2015/05/01/irs-steals-107000-from-convenience-store http://reason.com/blog/2015/05/01/irs-steals-107000-from-con... The above article do

http://reason.com/blog/2015/05/01/irs-steals-107000-from-convenience-store http://reason.com/blog/2015/05/01/irs-steals-107000-from-con... The above article doesn't leave out the fact that this seizure was initiated two months after the policy change. Looks like the policy has only changed on paper. It also doesn't fail to mention that the justification for the gag order was to prevent tipping off the suspect, but it has already been established that McLellan committed no crime, so its explicitly being used to keep this from the public's attention. It's unfortunate that NYT is so bad at reporting the relevant facts.