3 ms·
StackOverflow's database doesn't need to work that hard because the vast majority of traffic is read requests for public, essentially static webpages that get r
by superuser2 12y ago
StackOverflow's database doesn't need to work that hard because the vast majority of traffic is read requests for public, essentially static webpages that get re-rendered and updated a handful of times in their lifecycle. I'd guess 90% or more could be served by a reverse proxy without ever touching SQL Server or even the app tier.
It would be easy to exceed its DB load with an application that serves unique content to each user, is write-heavy, etc.
- y0ghur7_xxx 12y ago> It would be easy to exceed its DB load with an application that serves unique content to each user, is write-heavy, etc. Just curious: did YOU ever reach that point? I mean where a well optimized db engine reached it's limit? Can I ask you on what website?