Perhaps I should add a provision, then, that states that if you know you yourself or those associated with you will be harmed in the process of cooperation in a

Perhaps I should add a provision, then, that states that if you know you yourself or those associated with you will be harmed in the process of cooperation in a fashion that outweighs the need to bring the offender to justice, and you have at your disposal other means to help bring the persons to account (ties to hacktivist resources, or some other form of "non-traditional" justice such as vigilantism, etc), then you also have the option to take action in that way. In other words, the moral obligation is at its root to eliminate the threat to society, but in a way that keeps others from being brought down with that person. Yes, this is all hard to untangle, especially in today's American and European legal systems, but as more and more people are arrested and go to jail for fighting for what they believe is "right" for human society, the more aware those in power to make changes to those legal systems will be, and hopefully will move to see that change implemented sooner than later.