3 ms·
On average, the link would be at least as long as the book.
by recursive 12y ago
On average, the link would be at least as long as the book.
- jonotrain 12y agoI think yk's idea is excellent - I'm actually working on it right now. You're correct that the book locations need to be about as long as the book to provide sufficient unique values - but it isn't humanly or temporally possible for people to bookmark that many pages - so a separate index of bookmarked pages could use much shorter urls.
- anotheryou 12y agoand please make the bookmarks unguessable and private. I want to sent moderately private letters, that where already "written" in the library :)
- jonotrain 12y agoI'm glad you suggested that - will do.
- anotheryou 11y agoletters where sent :) I'm still amazed at the project, thank you
- octatoan 12y agoNot if you let the first linked page be site.com/1, the next one site.com/2 and so on, I think.
- Tinyyy 12y agoHow does that even make sense? Taking a lower base will only require more characters.
- recursive 12y agoYes, even then. Sure "1" and "2" are pretty short. And even "57834573495879436129386943" is pretty short. But the average link would have so many digits, I couldn't post it in this comment.
- jonotrain 12y agoThe bookmarks would only need to map to the book locations - you would only need sufficient values for the number of bookmarked pages, not the entire range of possibilities.