3 ms·

Yeah IE has been fairly respectable since 9+

• streptomycin 11y ago
  Would be nice if it was more than "fairly respectable". Also, I wouldn't trust http://status.modern.ie http://status.modern.ie too much. For example, IE is missing some IndexedDB features https://github.com/InternetExplorer/Status.IE/issues/104 https://github.com/InternetExplorer/Status.IE/issues/104 but you'll see no mention of that on their status site. From there, it looks like everything is perfect.
  • lucid00 11y ago
    IndexedDB support is horrible across all browsers. You'd be surprised at how much of the spec Chrome doesn't support.
    • streptomycin 11y ago
      Actually I wouldn't, because I've built a non-trivial app using IndexedDB :) But don't believe me, believe the results of the W3C test suite: http://w3c.github.io/test-results/IndexedDB/all.html http://w3c.github.io/test-results/IndexedDB/all.html And don't just look at the headline numbers, look at the tests that actually fail, because some are more important than others. The only test that fails in Chrome [1] is only marginally meaningful. It would be nice if they got it working, but all the tests that actually use IndexedDB pass in Chrome. 100%. Firefox is almost as good as Chrome, but it fails on tests of error handling for a few edge cases that are very unlikely to occur in the real world. IE and Safari have many failures for tests of core functionality (Safari is even worse than IE if you look at the individual tests that fail, rather than the overall %). [1] https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/blob/master/IndexedDB/interfaces.html https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/blob/master/Indexe...