3 ms·
Why only "he"? You are also pointing out that there were a bunch of accomplices - why shouldn't they be treated as such? If a "mundane" were to shoot someone an
by mdpopescu 12y ago
Why only "he"? You are also pointing out that there were a bunch of accomplices - why shouldn't they be treated as such? If a "mundane" were to shoot someone and his friends tried to cover it up, wouldn't they also be charged?