The problem that the author describes is that we can’t discover who’s naturally immune and thereby develop cures if we always halt the natural immune process wi

The problem that the author describes is that we can’t discover who’s naturally immune and thereby develop cures if we always halt the natural immune process with treatments. I don’t know how scientifically valid this is, but it seems at least a valid ethical concern: if we could eradicate a deadly disease by sacrificing a few people, should we?