3 ms·
Indeed. This part constitutes the science: "When the superstar entered a tournament, every other golfer took, on average, 0.8 more strokes." The rest is specu
by Dove 17y ago
Indeed. This part constitutes the science: "When the superstar entered a tournament, every other golfer took, on average, 0.8 more strokes." The rest is speculation.
- neilc 17y agoIn fact, even that phrasing is slightly misleading, because it suggests causality -- I suspect the evidence only supports correlation. The article is a particularly idiotic example of uninformed speculation passing for science journalism.