3 ms·
Apparently not: >We thus designed a brief questionnaire and distributed it to four groups of experts in 2012/2013. The median estimate of respondents was for a
by Houshalter 12y ago
Apparently not:
>We thus designed a brief questionnaire and distributed it to four groups of experts in 2012/2013. The median estimate of respondents was for a one in two chance that high-level machine intelligence will be developed around 2040-2050, rising to a nine in ten chance by 2075. Experts expect that systems will move
on to superintelligence in less than 30 years thereafter. They estimate the chance is about one in three that this development turns out to be ‘bad’ or ‘extremely bad’ for humanity.
http://www.nickbostrom.com/papers/survey.pdf http://www.nickbostrom.com/papers/survey.pdf
The people warning about the future of are pretty familiar with AI. Your accusations that they are all idiots who have no understanding of AI is way off the mark.
A number of notable people also signed the future of life institute open letter warning about AI: http://futureoflife.org/misc/open_letter http://futureoflife.org/misc/open_letter
- rekt 12y ago
- jacquesm 12y agoThey're not idiots but their funding depends on them being able to move the needle within their career window. As for the warning letter: Asimov and other SF authors have been writing such letters for the longest time, there is nothing new there that hasn't been covered many times over.