5 ms·
That does make sense, but the article is saying that people screwed up because they overthought their current strategies and played worse than normally, not bec
by tudorachim 17y ago
That does make sense, but the article is saying that people screwed up because they overthought their current strategies and played worse than normally, not because they overcorrected in the other direction and took more risks.
- idoh 17y agoThe only facts quoted in the article are: Tiger woods in dominant, and "[w]hen the superstar entered a tournament, every other golfer took, on average, 0.8 more strokes. This effect was even more pronounced when Woods was playing well." Based solely on the above they draw their conclusions. I'm just pointing out that there is a simpler and more rational conclusion one could draw.