4 ms·
I agree, but then I genuinely believe you are mistaken in what makes you faster: it's not the feedback that the touch is pressed (what you described in the abov
by nolok 12y ago
I agree, but then I genuinely believe you are mistaken in what makes you faster: it's not the feedback that the touch is pressed (what you described in the above post, and what haptic feedback currently solves), it's the feedback that the touch is even there ! In other words, it's not the pressing, but the finding/reaching the next key.
Again, I agree that current phone keyboard are faaar beyond an actual keyboard in speed, only arguing on the cause.
As I hinted in my previous message there are new haptic techs that aims to actually give a sensation of where the various keys are, I have never tried it but I hope they can do even half of what they claim.
- chimeracoder 12y ago> I agree, but then I genuinely believe you are mistaken in what makes you faster: it's not the feedback that the touch is pressed (what you described in the above post, and what haptic feedback currently solves), it's the feedback that the touch is even there That's my point. Haptic feedback doesn't solve this, as evidenced by the keyboards that have haptic feedback on keypress but no tactile indication that the key has been located.
- nolok 12y agoThen either I misunderstood or you weren't clear enough, your first message said > As a touch typist, I depend on a certain amount of feedback to my fingers to identify when a key has been actuated [...] > how could I know the spacebar registered properly Which specifically means when the key is pressed, not when you are on it / reached it, which I believe is the thing causing the slow down of our speed.