3 ms·

I have zero tolerance for misogyny. Disgusting, insulting article.

• totony 11y ago
  Nice job calling misogyny, very thought comment that added something to the reading. Next time provuding arguments might be a good idea. This article cites facts about mariage: it has went down and tries to show why that could be so, how is this misogyny? I didnt see hate torwards women, just someone arguing that mariage laws advantage women and men are being cautious and do not want to marry.
  • DanBC 11y ago
    Source is the Daily Mail which is a ridiculous rag. It's kind of surprising that it's not already in a blocklist. If gawker is auto-killed anything from daily mail deserves to be auto-killed too. EDIT: honest, the daily mail is scum and noone takes it seriously. Try an HN search for [daily mail rag] to see other HN users give their opinion of this joke of a newspaper. http://www.badscience.net/2010/10/the-caveat-in-paragraph-number-19/#more-1826 http://www.badscience.net/2010/10/the-caveat-in-paragraph-nu... https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7437425 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7437425 Why the daily mail is evil: https://youtube.com/watch?v=r9dqNTTdYKY https://youtube.com/watch?v=r9dqNTTdYKY
    • paulhauggis 11y ago
      The more you don't want me to read it, the more I think there is truth to the article that you don't want to admit.
      • DanBC 11y ago
        You are a typical Daily Mail reader. You'd like it.
  • dropit_sphere 11y ago
    Why are you defending sexism?