>To always use the same versions of every dependency you'll want to shrink wrap. Does "shrink wrap" mean "bundle"? If so, I strongly disagree. It's possible

>To always use the same versions of every dependency you'll want to shrink wrap. Does "shrink wrap" mean "bundle"? If so, I strongly disagree. It's possible to explicitly use the exact same versions of dependencies without resorting to bundling all the source/binaries. Guix and Nix are particularly well suited for this. >And yes, of course dependencies have dependencies. But you have to admit that the depth of this dependency tree is insane.