I don't think that represents well what was said: * "Of the 61 non-replicated studies, scientists classed 24 as producing findings at least “moderately similar

I don't think that represents well what was said: * "Of the 61 non-replicated studies, scientists classed 24 as producing findings at least “moderately similar” to those of the original experiments, even though they did not meet pre-established criteria" * "Daniele Fanelli, who studies bias and scientific misconduct at Stanford University in California, says ... psychology does not necessarily lag behind ... other sciences. ... earlier studies have suggested that reproducibility rates in cancer biology and drug discovery could be even lower"