>others will argue that GS is abstractly bettering the world through efficient resource/money allocation, especially for developing countries This would be tru

>others will argue that GS is abstractly bettering the world through efficient resource/money allocation, especially for developing countries This would be true if GS didn't scam people, which they do. I accept the investment allocation argument, but I'm not convinced that it's valid for GS specifically. EDIT: Holy shit, that controversies section just goes on and on. I just checked, and it's 7000 words long. This company's insane.