4 ms·
He did not reply to me. That was someone else. Your remarkable impudence is a shame. Edit: Also I - still - did not participate in any argument about gamer ga
by fwn 12y ago
He did not reply to me. That was someone else.
Your remarkable impudence is a shame.
Edit: Also I - still - did not participate in any argument about gamer gate. I - still - did not edit anything in the thread you mentioned.
I can't belive I am even answering your tirades.
Edit2: Nobody in the thread answered on my post. I am on hacker news because I don't want to engage in hostile arguments and hateful accusations. Keep that for yourself. Leave me in peace.
- DonHopkins 12y agoYes actually he did reply to you. Why is that message in your history then? Did somebody hack your account, or are you still lying? Each time you lie you dig yourself deeper. You were projecting when you accused other people of exploiting the suicide to promote their agenda (while using it to promote your own), and you're projecting when you're calling me impudent now. When you deleted it, it no longer appeared on the discussion page unless you set showdead = yes, but is still in your history: https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=fwn https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=fwn If you have showdead = yes, you can clearly see your posting marked [deleted] and his reply to it here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9458661 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9458661 Aren't you aware that it's easy for anyone to check and prove that you're lying? What exactly did you mean by "Ok, I feel like I'm on /r/all ..." and why did you post that? Can you explain your own words, please? What did you originally say that caused smhenderson to reply directly to you "And here you are on hacker news using it to push yours." and that got downvoted so much than you edited it then deleted it? Obviously you edited it then deleted it, since his direct reply to your post is to something else than your comment about /r/all. And while we're on the topic that you raised in the first place, and you seem to have an agenda to push about it, what are your views on gamer gate?
- fwn 12y agoSo now, after your insults and allegations, you want to have a little debate with me, right? Unbelievable.
- DonHopkins 12y agoI proved my point with evidence. You're lying and blustering. You're unbelievable, since you can't counter the evidence I've presented, so now you're just calling me names. That says a lot about the you, the kind of person who would exploit the tragic suicide of a transgendered person to push their misogynistic gamer gate agenda, and then bluster and lie through their teeth about not editing their comment, in spite of the incontrovertible evidence, when caught red handed.
- DonHopkins 12y agoYes somebody did answer your post, and I linked to the answer and quoted it: "And here you are on hacker news using it to push yours." -smhenderson https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9458661 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9458661 (set showdead = true to see). Please stop lying. You're the one who started a hostile hateful argument with your post, which smhenderson replied to, which got downvoted until light gray, which you edited then deleted, which I've proven. Explain that last post in your history, which everyone can see. Counter the evidence I've presented, or admit you're wrong, instead of blustering and stonewalling and ignoring the evidence.
- DanBC 12y agoYou owe fwn an apology. You've misunderstood how HN handles user-deleted posts and how it handles flagged posts and how it positions posts and leapt to the wrong conclusion.