3 ms·
He will have willfully broken the terms of his contract. That's generally considered illegal and GS should have a fairly strong civil case against him given wha
by lucozade 12y ago
He will have willfully broken the terms of his contract. That's generally considered illegal and GS should have a fairly strong civil case against him given what the defence has admitted to.
Can't for the life of me think why this should be a criminal case though. Not sure how the American people are served by a conviction.
- fweespeech 12y agoYeah, that is my problem with it. It isn't a criminal case, just a civil one.
- fastball 12y agoIs "illegal" not generally reserved for criminal law? Sure, he broke his contract, and yes, that is grounds for a civil suit. But I'm not sure I would call it "illegal".
- dmix 12y agoIt is still technically in violation of a (civil) law so it could be considered illegal. But agreed, typically illegal is most often used in the context of criminal matters.