6 ms·

How would a rejection differ from sending it back for revisions? Are you imagining a blackout period for that submitter?

• sukilot 11y ago
  The first review can be binding, so a peer reviewer is forbidden from overriding any findings of prior art. Appeals could require litigation or.exponentially increasing fees .
  • Afton 11y ago
    Please answer these two questions: 1. What is wrong with revising a patent based on Patent Office feedback? "P.O.:This is objectionable for reasons x, y, z" , "Applicant: Ok, thanks, I'll change x, y, z so as not to be objectionable". This seems like a reasonable exchange on the face of it. 2. How will you distinguish 'revisions' from 'new' patents that are substantially similar to previous patent applications? Remember that some companies (MSFT/Google/IBM) file for many, many patents every year.
    • sologoub 11y ago
      Revisions can keep coming back. No one in the patent office can stop the patent outright and prevent it from coming back. If someone file a patent for something obvious, the examiner cannot completely reject it. Ideally, the rejection should go in a searchable database/knowledgebase and prevent from anyone else, including the original filer from filling again.