4 ms·

Uhm, ok. I do not relate to anything gamer-gate. I think you wanted to reply to someone else? Edit: Also I did not edit anything recently, I really think this

by fwn 12y ago

Uhm, ok. I do not relate to anything gamer-gate. I think you wanted to reply to someone else? Edit: Also I did not edit anything recently, I really think this is a mistake.

DonHopkins 12y ago
Yes you certainly did. It's the message in your history right after this, that is downvoted so it's very light gray, that you edited after you were downvoted and before you deleted it to say "Ok, I feel like I'm on /r/all ..." Remember it now? Why are you trying to deny something that everyone can verify is true? [1] [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9458762 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9458762 "Also I did not edit anything recently" is a lie. Can you explain why you edited it then deleted it, now that I've reminded you what you did? I agree with smhenderson's reply: "And here you are on hacker news using it to push yours." [2] [2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9458756 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9458756 What was really annoying about what you wrote was that YOU were the first person to exploit the suicide to push your own gamer-gate agenda by hypocritically accusing other people in the discussion of using the suicide to push their own agenda, which they were not. You were accusing people of doing what you were doing yourself, while they weren't actually doing what you accused them of themselves. Next time, don't post misogynistic gamer gate stuff like that, accusing people of doing exactly what you're doing, so then you won't have to edit it, delete it, then lie about it afterwards. This is not the place for that kind of behavior, especially the hypocrisy and lying about it afterwards parts.
- fwn 12y ago
  He did not reply to me. That was someone else. Your remarkable impudence is a shame. Edit: Also I - still - did not participate in any argument about gamer gate. I - still - did not edit anything in the thread you mentioned. I can't belive I am even answering your tirades. Edit2: Nobody in the thread answered on my post. I am on hacker news because I don't want to engage in hostile arguments and hateful accusations. Keep that for yourself. Leave me in peace.
  - DonHopkins 12y ago
    Yes actually he did reply to you. Why is that message in your history then? Did somebody hack your account, or are you still lying? Each time you lie you dig yourself deeper. You were projecting when you accused other people of exploiting the suicide to promote their agenda (while using it to promote your own), and you're projecting when you're calling me impudent now. When you deleted it, it no longer appeared on the discussion page unless you set showdead = yes, but is still in your history: https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=fwn https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=fwn If you have showdead = yes, you can clearly see your posting marked [deleted] and his reply to it here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9458661 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9458661 Aren't you aware that it's easy for anyone to check and prove that you're lying? What exactly did you mean by "Ok, I feel like I'm on /r/all ..." and why did you post that? Can you explain your own words, please? What did you originally say that caused smhenderson to reply directly to you "And here you are on hacker news using it to push yours." and that got downvoted so much than you edited it then deleted it? Obviously you edited it then deleted it, since his direct reply to your post is to something else than your comment about /r/all. And while we're on the topic that you raised in the first place, and you seem to have an agenda to push about it, what are your views on gamer gate?
    - fwn 12y ago
      So now, after your insults and allegations, you want to have a little debate with me, right? Unbelievable.
      - DonHopkins 12y ago
        I proved my point with evidence. You're lying and blustering. You're unbelievable, since you can't counter the evidence I've presented, so now you're just calling me names. That says a lot about the you, the kind of person who would exploit the tragic suicide of a transgendered person to push their misogynistic gamer gate agenda, and then bluster and lie through their teeth about not editing their comment, in spite of the incontrovertible evidence, when caught red handed.
  - 12y ago

by fwn 12y ago

Uhm, ok. I do not relate to anything gamer-gate. I think you wanted to reply to someone else? Edit: Also I did not edit anything recently, I really think this is a mistake.

DonHopkins 12y ago

Yes you certainly did. It's the message in your history right after this, that is downvoted so it's very light gray, that you edited after you were downvoted and before you deleted it to say "Ok, I feel like I'm on /r/all ..." Remember it now? Why are you trying to deny something that everyone can verify is true? [1] [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9458762 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9458762 "Also I did not edit anything recently" is a lie. Can you explain why you edited it then deleted it, now that I've reminded you what you did? I agree with smhenderson's reply: "And here you are on hacker news using it to push yours." [2] [2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9458756 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9458756 What was really annoying about what you wrote was that YOU were the first person to exploit the suicide to push your own gamer-gate agenda by hypocritically accusing other people in the discussion of using the suicide to push their own agenda, which they were not. You were accusing people of doing what you were doing yourself, while they weren't actually doing what you accused them of themselves. Next time, don't post misogynistic gamer gate stuff like that, accusing people of doing exactly what you're doing, so then you won't have to edit it, delete it, then lie about it afterwards. This is not the place for that kind of behavior, especially the hypocrisy and lying about it afterwards parts.

fwn 12y ago
He did not reply to me. That was someone else. Your remarkable impudence is a shame. Edit: Also I - still - did not participate in any argument about gamer gate. I - still - did not edit anything in the thread you mentioned. I can't belive I am even answering your tirades. Edit2: Nobody in the thread answered on my post. I am on hacker news because I don't want to engage in hostile arguments and hateful accusations. Keep that for yourself. Leave me in peace.
- DonHopkins 12y ago
  Yes actually he did reply to you. Why is that message in your history then? Did somebody hack your account, or are you still lying? Each time you lie you dig yourself deeper. You were projecting when you accused other people of exploiting the suicide to promote their agenda (while using it to promote your own), and you're projecting when you're calling me impudent now. When you deleted it, it no longer appeared on the discussion page unless you set showdead = yes, but is still in your history: https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=fwn https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=fwn If you have showdead = yes, you can clearly see your posting marked [deleted] and his reply to it here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9458661 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9458661 Aren't you aware that it's easy for anyone to check and prove that you're lying? What exactly did you mean by "Ok, I feel like I'm on /r/all ..." and why did you post that? Can you explain your own words, please? What did you originally say that caused smhenderson to reply directly to you "And here you are on hacker news using it to push yours." and that got downvoted so much than you edited it then deleted it? Obviously you edited it then deleted it, since his direct reply to your post is to something else than your comment about /r/all. And while we're on the topic that you raised in the first place, and you seem to have an agenda to push about it, what are your views on gamer gate?
  - fwn 12y ago
    So now, after your insults and allegations, you want to have a little debate with me, right? Unbelievable.
    - DonHopkins 12y ago
      I proved my point with evidence. You're lying and blustering. You're unbelievable, since you can't counter the evidence I've presented, so now you're just calling me names. That says a lot about the you, the kind of person who would exploit the tragic suicide of a transgendered person to push their misogynistic gamer gate agenda, and then bluster and lie through their teeth about not editing their comment, in spite of the incontrovertible evidence, when caught red handed.
- 12y ago