It's odd. On the one hand, what dlss said. On the other hand, we keep moving the goalposts. AI always seems to be defined as "a computer doing something a human

It's odd. On the one hand, what dlss said. On the other hand, we keep moving the goalposts. AI always seems to be defined as "a computer doing something a human can but a computer cannot", with the obvious recursion. A better question would be how powerful would a human level AI actually be. Personally, not very. Or rather, it'd be fragile as all get out. But that is another matter...