3 ms·
That is today's prices, based past demand. As demand for SSL hosting goes up, gradually replacing plaintext hosting, the price will come down. I actually expec
by pdkl95 12y ago
That is today's prices, based past demand. As demand for SSL hosting goes up, gradually replacing plaintext hosting, the price will come down.
I actually expect the price of plaintext HTTP hosting to go up a bit; partly due to reduced demand, but also due to increased risk/liability. With SSL being the "industry best practice", I expect at least a few bean counters will view the risk of private information leaks or hypothetical legal liability for enabling DDOS (similar to the "attractive nuisance" doctrine).
There will be a turbulent transition period, of course. As someone currently living at the poverty line, I have argued against the CA system many times. A SSL cert (and anual renewal) may be an insignificant cost to some people, but it is a real barrier when tha cost represents days/weeks of food. Unfortunately, none of this removes the need for encryption or the risks of plaintext. This is why I'm very excited about Let’s Encrypt; It might solve the cost problem, and it might avoid the StartSSL "no second-source" problem because it is a protocol first.
Internet use is only going up, so these transition costs are only going to go up. We can pay it now, or pay even more in the future.
- merrua 12y agoDemand going up does not always mean that pricing goes down. Especially when supply is limited
- pdkl95 12y agoObviously. What's your point? That the price of SSL hosting will stay the same? Go up? I never claimed it would equalize perfectly, just that it would get cheaper in the future. Also, why do you think the supply of SSL hosting services is necessarily limited any more than traditional plaintext hosting would be?