>no compelling medical reason to do it. Because potentially eradicating disorders that lead to a decreased quality of life for hundreds, thousands, if not mill

>no compelling medical reason to do it. Because potentially eradicating disorders that lead to a decreased quality of life for hundreds, thousands, if not millions of people is not a compelling enough reason to alter non-viable embryos? I'd like to highlight the word non-viable again. These are not embryos that can develop into potential life. They allow us to study disorders that affect actual, living people that could potential improve the quality of life for people worldwide or save actual, living people. But my morals that make me want to save actual, living people must mean I'm immoral?