I like this essay, not because I agree with most of its arguments, but because it raises interesting ones. What's frustrating about it, to me, is that the main

I like this essay, not because I agree with most of its arguments, but because it raises interesting ones. What's frustrating about it, to me, is that the main thrust seems to be "There are problems with TLS, and especially using it everywhere", which is very valid. But then the message / proposed solution is "let's just give up on TLS except for what I arbitrarily define as important". What I would have hoped for is "let's try to make it better".