> starting with version 1.0, we will not be introducing any more breaking changes to Nim. I wonder whether they will stay committed to that. Pretty much all de

> starting with version 1.0, we will not be introducing any more breaking changes to Nim. I wonder whether they will stay committed to that. Pretty much all developers of other "living" languages I know who do not have strong industry support and thus pressure not to break working code introduce breaking changes all the time e.g. see D. Nim could distinguish itself from the crowd with such a commitment to stability. However I expect overwhelming pressure from the enthusiast crowd which currently utterly dominates among Nim users to introduce breaking changes even post-1.0. And with little pressure from the other direction..