4 ms·
Basically it's his flagrant disrespect and violation of human privacy at a mindbogglingly massive scale. He got us here by tricking us with cheap tricks. https
by pen2l 12y ago
Basically it's his flagrant disrespect and violation of human privacy at a mindbogglingly massive scale.
He got us here by tricking us with cheap tricks. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/04/facebooks-evil-interfaces https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/04/facebooks-evil-interfa...
The way I see, he is one of the worst things to happen to the Internet if not the worst, but that's just my opinion.
- cymetica 12y agoI could not agree more!
- tim333 12y agoMeh - I'm on facebook all the time. Maybe they track my not very interesting interests and people use them to show ads which uBlock then blocks. His "flagrant disrespect and violation of my human privacy" doesn't really bother me. If I was doing anything I wanted to keep private I wouldn't do it on facebook - I just assume stuff on facebook is semi public. I'm not sure quite what the big problem is.
- sqeaky 12y agoYour notion that you can simply maintain privacy by not using facebook is part of the problem. For a long time facebook tracked people using flash cookies (also called Local Shared Objects) to track people with opinions flawed like your own around various website that are not facebook. What if they use some more devious tricks now? You might say that you use noscript, adblock or something else, but what about profiling you based information created by you browser. Browser fingerprinting - https://panopticlick.eff.org/ https://panopticlick.eff.org/ - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Device_fingerprint http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Device_fingerprint I would rather simply avoid facebook and deal with people without a history of ethical issues.