3 ms·
Microsoft.com being redesigned to push Silverlight
- nickb 19y agoThat's an SEO and usability suicide. Heck, Adobe owns Flash and yet pretty much all of their pages are in (X)HTML/CSS. They're smart enough to understand what the place for these in-browser technologies is.
- eusman 19y agoMS used flash in their home page in the past, if I'm not wrong..
- pietro 19y agoThey've used Flash all over the place for product presentations and adds.
- icey 19y agoMy guess is that they'll use it at first for sound / video content. I would venture to guess that they'll bundle it as part of MSN Messenger at some point in the future as well, since it's a small addon to the .net runtime.
- troels 19y agoThey use it at http://channel9.msdn.com/ http://channel9.msdn.com/ which has prevented me from viewing a podcast or two, which I otherwise would.
- idea 19y agoYesterday when i wanted to download something from microsoft.com i got a popup asking if i wanted to beta test the download with Silverlight. Of course i clicked it away. Downloading is a task of the browser. If the functionality is poor, fix the browser. Microsoft is not alone in this. Adobe, Sun and other companies also try to push useless download managers.
- Tichy 19y agoSure, that's the way to get Spyware on your computer.
- mattcarbone 19y agoThis just shows that they don't understand their own technology. RIA/browser plugins have their place, but not for corporate home pages. If this was the case then Adobe.com would be a full screen flex app and Sun.com would be an applet. arrg.
- gruseom 19y agoI bet they are doing this to get Silverlight deployed to as many computers as they can.
- angstrom 19y agoI believe they have to as a good show of faith or else risk hypocrisy for not touching their own dog food.
- gruseom 19y agoMS hardly have to redesign their whole website away from HTML, nor is their history one of great effort to eschew hypocrisy. Besides, the dog food story is easy: have a token project or two so people can't say you don't use your own stuff. That's what MS did with SourceSafe and arguably .NET as well. This seems to me a gutsier move. Flash's greatest strength (and Silverlight's greatest weakness) is its installed base. MS have a big asset in the 8th most visited website; to put it in the service of deploying Silverlight is pretty daring and reminiscent of the MS of old... not necessarily a good thing! But I'm just speculating and could be wrong.