3 ms·
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/chocolatey/a8WdEoF-M58 https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/chocolatey/a8WdEoF-M... > What does this mean for Chocol
by cwyers 12y ago
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/chocolatey/a8WdEoF-M58 https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/chocolatey/a8WdEoF-M...
> What does this mean for Chocolatey? More awesome. More security. More better. Chocolatey is going nowhere, OneGet is a core API that enables package managers to hook in and take advantage of Windows components easier.
> The best understanding I have is that OneGet is shipping with a prototype plugin compatible with Chocolatey. Right now this means that it is separate from Chocolatey. We will be working with Garrett to bring the plugin over to core Chocolatey as we rewrite the Chocolatey client in C# this year.
> Right now folks are getting up in arms as they see this as a replacement for Chocolatey and it is not. Chocolatey will need to build a few hooks for use with OneGet.
- towelguy 12y agoSo Chocolatey is gonna use OneGet in the back? I was thinking it would be a package provider for OneGet instead.
- squeaky-clean 12y agoI don't know much about how this works, but it looks like that's exactly it. https://github.com/OneGet/ChocolateyProvider https://github.com/OneGet/ChocolateyProvider