4 ms·
Maps too, from what I hear. The problem is scalability. If no one carried maps, everyone would have to talk verbally and take notes with ATC for five minutes
by VLM 12y ago
Maps too, from what I hear. The problem is scalability. If no one carried maps, everyone would have to talk verbally and take notes with ATC for five minutes for every landing to make sure nothing had changed.
If only a couple planes pester ATC then the system will keep up. It would be safe enough. What are the odds of an inflight emergency requiring a diversion at any instant? Pretty low. So if it happened to one plane they'd figure it out verbally. However requiring all ATC and all pilots to talk over all maps at all landings isn't scalable.
Something similar happens with manuals. One plane loses a system and its ipad, you call home on the radio or satphone or contact a fellow pilot on 123.45 MHz or call ATC for help. This doesn't scale to every plane in the air at the same time for every mostly minor maintenance writeup. Maybe you can ignore error messages this flight, after all most measurable things are not important, just like in business. Or maybe engine code 3141Z.kjdf.subsection2 means the engine is about to explode on the wing, but you've got no manuals...
Something often overlooked is megacorp analysis paralysis. You'll be formally written up if you don't file an engine operation temperature profile thingy form or some meaningless catering receipts or whatever according to boring corporate policy, and it will be brought up at your annual performance review, affect your promotion chances, etc. This scales pretty well when one ipad breaks and you use the copilots ipad or call your boss and argue and he issues you an indulgence or the boss takes dictation of the form for you or you refuse to fly (its only one flight after all). This doesn't scale well when every ipad in a company stops working.
Personally, if I were in a plane over water and I lost all my papers out the window, no fuel estimates, no weight and balance, no maps, no flight plan, no list of obstacles, no nav plan, no notes, nothing at all, I'd probably panic and head for the closest coastal airport (and where is that, without any docs?) If one plane does this, it scales VERY well. ATC calms you down, vectors you in, gives you some geographical advice, and you land. If every plane in the air does this simultaneously, you'll overload ATC and probably get someone killed.
This applies everywhere to all industries not just planes.
- phdp 12y agoCharts, not maps ;)
- innguest 12y agoYou got me curious. Can you explain? Etymologically there's no good word for map (mappa meant napkin, charta meant a sheet of paper) but 'tabula' was used in Classical times.
- jsmthrowaway 12y agohttp://www.nauticalcharts.noaa.gov/mcd/learn_diff_map_chart.html http://www.nauticalcharts.noaa.gov/mcd/learn_diff_map_chart.... Aeronautical charts extrapolate from this because being in command of an aircraft is really just commanding a different kind of vessel. Port, starboard, manifest, fix, captain, first officer, and hull are all valid aviation terms, for example, with roots in the sea. A chart is not a map.
- innguest 12y agoThank you! I'd have trouble explaining to someone what the precise difference is but now I can wear my consequentialist hat and explain that they are different because they are used differently.
- ceejayoz 12y ago> If every plane in the air does this simultaneously, you'll overload ATC and probably get someone killed. We've already had a test run for this, and it worked fine. 9/11 involved exactly that scenario - every flight in or heading to the US had to make for the nearest airport and land immediately.
- scott00 12y agoBut those planes all had access to their charts and weren't reliant on ATC for navigation.