4 ms·
Nobody does that. That would be insanely stupid. The product these people are selling is legal. Why on earth would they add a Schedule 1 compound to their legal
by tyho 11y ago
Nobody does that. That would be insanely stupid. The product these people are selling is legal. Why on earth would they add a Schedule 1 compound to their legal mix? Why would they do that when that compound is very expensive compared to the product they are selling.
The claims of dealers lacing softer drugs with harder ones is classic DEA FUD. Drug dealers are generally not the smarted bunch but they know not to cut a cheap drug with an expensive one.
That being said, a common DEA lie was that cocaine was being cut with rat poison. This actually started happening in South Africa where it caused many deaths because the South African drug dealers thought that the Americans were doing it when in fact it was just invented by the DEA to scare people off of coke.
What possible evidence do you have to make you think that somebody put meth in there?
- madaxe_again 11y agoWith this specifically - none - but I have bought weed in the past that was quite definitely adulterated with something that ruined a game of poker. Everyone sweating bullets and shaking. Sore jaw in the morning. So - I know that the "broken glass in X" is DEA FUD, but idiot street dealers don't necessarily think in the same terms as you and I. Also - if you're synthesising your own chems, cost isn't an issue, you're just buying reagents.