3 ms·
Frankly, sounds like someone is selling meth as "synthetic weed". Making people chemically dependent sure is a great way to boost repeat custom. Something some
by madaxe_again 12y ago
Frankly, sounds like someone is selling meth as "synthetic weed". Making people chemically dependent sure is a great way to boost repeat custom.
Something something legalisation and regulation, demand, and supply.
- malka 12y agoGiven the difference in effect, I'm not sure that a customer that is given meth instead of MJ would be a happy customer.
- tyho 12y agoNobody does that. That would be insanely stupid. The product these people are selling is legal. Why on earth would they add a Schedule 1 compound to their legal mix? Why would they do that when that compound is very expensive compared to the product they are selling. The claims of dealers lacing softer drugs with harder ones is classic DEA FUD. Drug dealers are generally not the smarted bunch but they know not to cut a cheap drug with an expensive one. That being said, a common DEA lie was that cocaine was being cut with rat poison. This actually started happening in South Africa where it caused many deaths because the South African drug dealers thought that the Americans were doing it when in fact it was just invented by the DEA to scare people off of coke. What possible evidence do you have to make you think that somebody put meth in there?
- madaxe_again 12y agoWith this specifically - none - but I have bought weed in the past that was quite definitely adulterated with something that ruined a game of poker. Everyone sweating bullets and shaking. Sore jaw in the morning. So - I know that the "broken glass in X" is DEA FUD, but idiot street dealers don't necessarily think in the same terms as you and I. Also - if you're synthesising your own chems, cost isn't an issue, you're just buying reagents.