4 ms·
Yeah, that stood out to me too. I feel like these were design proofs that someone just threw on the page instead of building them out. Possibly someone who does
by okbake 11y ago
Yeah, that stood out to me too. I feel like these were design proofs that someone just threw on the page instead of building them out. Possibly someone who doesn't do much web dev. Even the markup is odd: tables with <br/>'s between them for the image rows and each image link is using an image <map> that spans the entire image instead of just using an anchor.
- sukilot 11y agoAmazon launched years before CSS2. If it ain't broke...
- unfunco 11y agoBut it is broken, the menu is made of images, as is much of the copy. It's not friendly for search (not just search engines, but Cmd + F, etcetera.) – it's not accessible, and it's difficult to read. It is broken. I even checked the URL to make sure it wasn't a phishing attempt. It's very lazy work from Amazon.