4 ms·
I’ve already hinted we need a monad Unless you are framework/lib programming, that is a phrase that should pretty much never be uttered.
by weego 12y ago
I’ve already hinted we need a monad
Unless you are framework/lib programming, that is a phrase that should pretty much never be uttered.
- dllthomas 12y agoCould you expand a bit?
- noelwelsh 12y agoIt's very hard to intuit your point from this brief comment. Expanding on it would be interesting (I almost certainly disagree but I welcome informed discussion).
- whateveracct 12y agoOr just architecting something in general. This talk [1] proposes a way to approach application architecture that will result in the programmers writing their own monads (or rather, their own FREE monads) [1] video: https://www.parleys.com/tutorial/composable-application-architecture-reasonably-priced-monads https://www.parleys.com/tutorial/composable-application-arch... | slides: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/4588997/ReasonablyPriced.pdf https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/4588997/ReasonablyPriced...
- bbcbasic 12y agoBut but... A monad is a framework :-) In the article case it is IO so if that ain't a framework, I don't know what is.