> dismissing the anti-GM crowd as 'anti-scientific folk' might be unreasonable As I pointed out in another comment[1] there's a wide gap between "what the publ

> dismissing the anti-GM crowd as 'anti-scientific folk' might be unreasonable As I pointed out in another comment[1] there's a wide gap between "what the public thinks and what scientists know" regarding GMOs[2]. Having an opinion that is the opposite to scientific consensus is by definition anti-scientific. [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9451873 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9451873 [2] http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/theres-a-gap-between-what-the-public-thinks-and-what-scientists-know/ http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/theres-a-gap-between-what...