5 ms·
There's not enough information for a fair opinion on the matter. The professor felt devalued from class behaviour, so he "made himself scarce". After establish
by Red_Tarsius 12y ago
There's not enough information for a fair opinion on the matter.
The professor felt devalued from class behaviour, so he "made himself scarce". After establishing credibility by telling us about his past experiences and successes, he quits for reasons we can all empathize with. Scarsity, social proof and authority are 3 of the six principles described by Cialdini's Influence.
- winsletts 12y agoI imagine this is one of those situations where the truth will never be available. All participates have taken sides, and have skewed / omitted / shaped their own stories for their own interests. I wish we had a black box recorder for organizational and cultural failures. [edited tone to convey agreement]
- IkmoIkmo 12y agoBut the article ends with a student expressing disbelief as he did decent work and getting an F before the class even ends, and the professor acknowledging that some students were fine, but that he exercised collective punishment because it was his only instrument. That seems pretty clear cut to me, definitely a bad move. It can't be justified, solves no problems and punishes innocent students. I'd understand why he'd fail some of his students, and I can also imagine situations where it's tricky to pinpoint and isolate the unwilling students from his class, and if made out to be a clown day in day out, lacking the proper instruments, management backing and (understandably) mental fortitude, that you'd leave the school at some point. But how that translates to giving an F to an entire class, including students who bore no responsibility and were as powerless to keep the class going the right way as he was, is beyond me.