I couldn't say for sure. If he wasn't actively hiding malicious intent, it sounds like he thought the priest cases were pretty straightforward and awful, rather

I couldn't say for sure. If he wasn't actively hiding malicious intent, it sounds like he thought the priest cases were pretty straightforward and awful, rather than involving repressed memories and ambiguous. The article lays out the controversy of that better than I ever could, when I finished it I figured I wouldn't be able to tell without digging into what he actually contributed to the panel. There does seem to be a common thread through his work, between fighting freudians and disputing repressed memories and multiple personality and I guess the transgender issue, he seems to emphasize that you can't take for granted that self-reporting is as trustworthy as people have tried to make it. But that's just my interpretation, I may be reading into that.