You're not wrong about the slight bloat in the marketing here, but I wouldn't say the article is disingenuous. In fact, I think the authors clearly wanted to p

You're not wrong about the slight bloat in the marketing here, but I wouldn't say the article is disingenuous. In fact, I think the authors clearly wanted to pull in readers, and once in, offer heart-felt examinations of multiple disciplines and the state they are in currently, good and bad. Remember, this is a report of the _innovation_ deficit, not funding. Through examination of the political and social ecosystems driving and holding back each discipline, and how each one fits within the priorities of our government, we see where innovation is lacking and potentially why.